I visited several and selected these dance websites:
(a) dancesport.org.au,

(b) dancesport.ca,

(c) eada.org.uk,

(d) dancesportireland.org, and

(e) dancesport.org.sg

as potential competitors of
(f) usadance.org.

Virtually all have shortcomings that underscore the need for a better design. Thus, I decided to just review usadance.org on these criteria:
Navigation & Usability
con. >87-link, vintage, Web 1.0, top nav, left menu…
pro. Links to virtually every little corner of their organization
Layout & Composition
con. Liquid content bar with either wide paddings or overflow covering the right bar!
pro. 3-column layout, albeit poorly designed.
Logo Identification
con. Poor layout of organization ID and tag line
pro. Prominent, but old-fashioned, top left logo
Imagery & Image Quality
con. Hodgepodge of images here & there
pro. Photos & videos of dances.
Color & Contrast
con. Vintage late ‘90s
pro. Simple, RGB color scheme & contrast
Visual Appeal
con. Minimal due to lame A/V and limited dance look and feel
pro. images & videos of dances
Typography
con. No “character,” looks like default fonts
pro. Mostly san-serifs fonts with enough contrast.
Site Map
Visit Site-map for an online version of this Dance Website’s Site-map.